The research conducted with VoteRiders to explore who lacks the proof of residency, identity, and citizenship they need to vote has garnered significant public interest and has become part of the congressional debate.
Our nationally representative survey has been featured in major national publications such as The Washington Post, USA Today, The New York Times, NBC, CNN, and National Public Radio. Regional outlets like the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, Ohio Capital Journal, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, The Oklahoman, and Pensacola News Journal have also covered our research. Furthermore, both liberal-leaning publications like Democracy Docket, Letters from An American, and Salon, as well as conservative-leaning publications like Gateway Pundit and The Federalist, have addressed our findings.
State surveys, such as our Texas survey covered by various media outlets, and the release of our new survey of Californians, syndicated by local media, have also received considerable attention. Our research played a central role in discussions around the SAVE America Act in U.S. Congress, with senators and representatives referencing our data during debates and hearings.
Key Takeaways:
VoteRiders’ expertise in helping individuals obtain necessary documents to vote has been instrumental in our research partnership. Our partnership with VoteRiders helped us gather valuable insights into the challenges faced by individuals lacking proper documentation to vote. Collaborating on surveys and collecting state-specific data enhanced the impact of our research on voter identification and proof of citizenship requirements. As we continue to delve into issues regarding residency, identity, and citizenship, we aim to engage with the public and policymakers effectively to drive meaningful change.
We appreciate the support of our funding partners, academic institutions, and government departments in promoting the public impact of our research. This collaborative effort ensures that our findings are disseminated widely to benefit society at large.
While conducting research on contentious issues like voter identification, it is essential to engage with various stakeholders who may have preconceived notions. By encouraging critical thinking and open dialogue, we can contribute to more informed public debates based on empirical evidence rather than ideological predispositions.
At CDCE, we are dedicated to unraveling the complexities of politics and collaborating with partners like VoteRiders to address critical societal issues. We invite you to share your thoughts and ideas on how research can create a positive impact on your community and beyond.
(Sam Novey, Chief Strategist at the Center for Democracy and Civic Engagement, and Mike Hanmer, Director of the University of Maryland Center for Democracy and Civic Engagement, contributed to this article.)
